Scott McCrea wrote:tl;dr
??
Moderator: Tim White
Scott McCrea wrote:tl;dr
Scott McCrea wrote:Sorry Jeff. Just making fun.
Jeff Bartlett wrote:Scott McCrea wrote:Sorry Jeff. Just making fun.
No apologies necessary! Hanging out with Andy Armstrong for a week made me realize that my loooong absence from Cavechat has deprived me of some good fun.
junkman wrote:The Figure-9 knot has more gradual bends then most knots which places less stress concentration at the bends.
And I like the Figure-9, it’s a good looking knot.
Jeff Bartlett wrote:junkman wrote:The Figure-9 knot has more gradual bends then most knots which places less stress concentration at the bends.
And I like the Figure-9, it’s a good looking knot.
I'd failed to notice that post about the Figure 9! The only part of this I disagree with is the part where you claim the figure 9 looks good, when in reality the figure 9 (on a bight) looks like a drunk guy tied a figure 8 and then backed over it with his car.
Jeff Bartlett wrote:junkman wrote:The Figure-9 knot has more gradual bends then most knots which places less stress concentration at the bends.
And I like the Figure-9, it’s a good looking knot.
I'd failed to notice that post about the Figure 9! The only part of this I disagree with is the part where you claim the figure 9 looks good, when in reality the figure 9 (on a bight) looks like a drunk guy tied a figure 8 and then backed over it with his car.
NZcaver wrote:Scott McCrea wrote:tl;dr
??
chh wrote:NZcaver wrote:Scott McCrea wrote:tl;dr
??
We use our words Mr. McCrea......
And my mind is blown permanently dude! Like, whooooah.
Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck]