Moderator: Moderators
John Chenger wrote:Actually, there's at least 2 organized mine clubs in that area that are more active than a lot of grottos.
wyandottecaver wrote:hmmm I find myself in the surprising position of defending john C.
First, his post was very relevent to the topic as the statement in the previous post by John T was made that "all the bats in NJ are in mines not visited by cavers".... and followed by........ "there hasn't been any serious caving in NJ since 2000" This implied, at least in my reading of that post, that caver spread was not mentioned because cavers (AKA people) werent going where the bats are.
Thus his assertion that there were at least 2 clubs who WERE actively going in mines would show that human transmission might be a factor (john C views on what "relevant data" means on that topic we do not agree on )
Further, he did not not mention NJ cavers or grottos (although the previous post itself claimed "no serious caving" was occuring in NJ.) I assure you that if these mine clubs go underground more than 1/month they ARE more active than many grottoes.
Kevins post actually made me laugh out loud. you get all sanctimonious about john C being ignorant of the thread and of NJ cavers and their activity levels and make it a point to interject information about your "alerts" for possible accidents during bat counts THEN have the gall to validate the previous posts that SAID THERE WASNT ANY SERIOUS CAVING IN NJ! Maybe you need to read the thread.
John T last post was very nearly outside the TOS and ridiculous to boot. The only "disparaging" thing john C said was that the mine groups were more active than "some grottoes" and YOU YOURSELF had just said there had been no serious caving in NJ?
The problem with forums (I'm guilty too) is that people type faster than they read and they read faster than they think.
Return to White Nose Syndrome (WNS)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users