by PYoungbaer » Mar 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Junkman, et al,
Here is the entire message I have put out to the NCC membership, which I believe puts the proposed motion in context. Please note that this is coming from me to the NCC from my role as NCC Vice President. For those outside the northeast, the NCC held an emergency meeting last February as WNS began rolling through our region. We closed all our caves - whether they contained bats or not. We also urged cavers to honor a voluntary moratorium on caving throughout the northeast. The NSS also closed its northeastern caves. All reopened in May. Some closed again for the winter, including the NSS Schoharie and Barton Hill Preserves (Gage's Cave), which had been previously open in the winter. I hope the full message below puts the motion in the proper context.
Peter
Dear NCC Members and Interested Others,
This past week, I asked to have an item put on the agenda next Sunday's regular quarterly meeting of the Northeastern Cave Conservancy (March 29, Gallupville House, Gallupville, NY, 10:00 AM) proposing that the NCC keep its caves closed. I'd like to explain why it reads the way it does, and why I am proposing it now. It reads as follows:
Youngbaer moves: That the NCC immediately close all its caves to any visitation, and that they remain closed until the threat of the spread of White Nose Syndrome has passed. Implicit in this motion is that the NCC immediately notify all known groups and organizations that typically visit its caves about the closure, and issue a press release informing the media and public, taking the opportunity to educate about why this measure is being taken, and that we encourage all cavers, recreational or otherwise, to adhere to a moratorium on all caving activity within the northeast during this period. Also implicit in this motion is that the NCC caves may be visited for the purpose of White Nose Syndrome research under conditions to be determined by the Executive Committee, which may include consultation with the NCC Science Chair, the NCC Conservation Chair, and the appropriate NCC Cave Managers.
My motion is a placeholder and a discussion prompter, as I've described it to the NCC Board. Given that the NCC meets only quarterly, unless a special meeting is called (which can take some time to organize), I wanted to make sure that we had a thorough discussion of what the NCC should do with its caves given all that is happening and may occur, and to have this discussion before the beginning of the summer caving season.
I am not aware of any move to keep the NSS caves closed in the area at this time, but there is national talk about what the NSS should do about WNS in general on many levels, and it wouldn't surprise me if there is action that affects them at some point. The NSS Board of Governors is meeting in Colorado April 3-5. There is a lot of discussion going on regarding the field camps connected with the International Congress of Speleology/NSS Convention this summer, particularly for those planned in WNS-affected areas.
I do know that Dave West plans to keep Guilday Preserve in West Virginia closed for the time being, and Virginia caving organizations, cave conservancies, and the state have issued a statewide moratorium through April 15, which is likely to be extended. West Virginia has done it a little differently, dividing the state into regions, with essentially a moratorium, except if you stayed in a particular area and not enter any clean caves. Of course, they are experiencing down there this year what we went through a year ago.
There is very serious discussion ongoing about how to contain or slow down WNS on a national basis, and what is appropriate for various states or caves, including outreach to scout and youth groups and show caves. Moratoria in different states are under discussion, and I want to ensure that we have a deliberative discussion about our role in all this as the cave conservancy at the epicenter of WNS, and how our actions may be viewed by others outside our region.
While most of the scientists working on WNS believe the primary movement of WNS is bat to bat, or environment to bat, there is mounting evidence of a human vector. The jumps to WVA and VA are beyond the range of summer bat movement, and coincide with high caver visitation and documented visits from people who have caved in the northeast. Yes, all are aware that there are other places with the same visitation, yet no appearance of WNS yet. That is one of the WNS mysteries that remain under investigation, but it does not mitigate the evidence of a human vector in those cases above.
The issue of cleaning and decontamination between our caves, or perhaps more importantly, between our caves and other non-affected caves is part of the equation.
Another thing I am very concerned about is being able to give enough lead time to all the groups that generally use the NCC (and local NSS) caves, if we are going to do something other than simply open the caves again as scheduled April 15 (or ice out). Many of these groups - such as camps - are already making plans. The sooner we can let them know about our caves, the better - through our groups use liaison, who maintains an excellent mailing list.
The wording of the motion is broad and restrictive. That is intentional. It is done for the highest impact, as was the action we took last winter. I am looking for people to think and talk about the most serious ramifications for dealing with WNS. That said, please remember that the NCC controls only its own caves. To the extent we have influence beyond that is up to you, the media, and the public. The NCC was well-served by its actions last year, and we may be in a similar leadership position this year.
It may be helpful to understand the NCC meeting procedures: The NCC agenda for Sunday's meeting has the issue of cave closures coming up under the Committee of the Whole - which is that portion of the meeting where the audience can participate. The NCC meetings are always open, and people are always welcome to attend. I hope many of you do attend, to hear what is going on, share your thoughts, and influence the Board action. Motions do not take place in the COTW, but are offered afterward. That's where you will see the motion I have proposed.
The motion can die for lack of a second, be amended, substitutes offered, postponed to a special meeting, defeated or adopted. All options are on the table, as with any motion.
As the NSS Liaison on WNS, I can tell you that things are happening very quickly. More is likely to occur. I really believe this is the appropriate time for us to have a thorough discussion with the broadest input. My intent is to take advantage of the attention on recent developments, and also the fact we had a regularly scheduled meeting prior to the summer caving season.
For more information about WNS, please see the NSS WNS page, where we have just completed a total update - including a special report on the scientific research, a report to the NSS President and BOG, and the latest news in the Media Digest links. The Virginia moratorium press release is also linked.
I hope this helps explain why this, and why now.
Peter Youngbaer
NCC VP