tncaver wrote:You tell me. There was no members manual this year.
Be that as it may, you can still look up NSS members here: http://caves.org/search.shtml.
IF you're a member yourself, that is.
And yes, Ann Froschauer is NSS Member #61262
Alex
Moderator: Moderators
tncaver wrote:You tell me. There was no members manual this year.
BrianC wrote:Isn't Ann F. a member of that recreational cavers organisation?
BrianC wrote:I think that many of us here know the answers, and know how to get this misinformation corrected.
BrianC wrote: "RETRIBUTION" must be included in any further corresponding from the NSS to the USFWS.
PYoungbaer wrote:BrianC wrote:I think that many of us here know the answers, and know how to get this misinformation corrected.
Great! Go do it!
Of course Peter, Just by writing these posts, we are getting a small part done right here.BrianC wrote:
"RETRIBUTION" must be included in any further corresponding from the NSS to the USFWS.
RETRIBUTION? Really? C'mon.
PYoungbaer wrote:Boogercaver - what article are you referring to? The Kentucky news article linked on page one of this thread has expired through its website, not at all unusual for numerous media outlets; the USFWS blog is definitely still up there, but I'm not sure what you're referring to re: partners. Please explain. If you go to http://www.fws.gov/WhiteNoseSyndrome/partners.html, you'll see the NSS is listed as a partner in the WNS investigation, as it has been for years, appropriately.
JSDunham wrote:I commented on their blog, but unknown if they will "moderate" it out of existence. I suggest others do the same, as well as on any news sources that repeat the number. Unless they are willing to justify it, I think we should assume it is false and take issue with it wherever it appears.
PYoungbaer wrote:BrianC wrote:
"RETRIBUTION" must be included in any further corresponding from the NSS to the USFWS.
RETRIBUTION? Really? C'mon.
BrianC wrote:Why not? Why not ask that we be compensated for a" loss of use" when the loss has been unsubstantiated, and realized by false data? Peter, I ask again Why Not?
GroundquestMSA wrote:PYoungbaer wrote:BrianC wrote:
"RETRIBUTION" must be included in any further corresponding from the NSS to the USFWS.
RETRIBUTION? Really? C'mon.BrianC wrote:Why not? Why not ask that we be compensated for a" loss of use" when the loss has been unsubstantiated, and realized by false data? Peter, I ask again Why Not?
Because we aren't seven years old.
(In case Peter is wholly stumped by your query, may I suggest this as a possible answer?)
Return to White Nose Syndrome (WNS)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users