by wyandottecaver » Jun 17, 2011 6:11 pm
hmmm while this article DOES have good news let's not overstate the findings.
1) it covered only 2 years.
2) based on cultures, the "rate" of WNS at the colony was 10% in 09' and nearly 50% in 10'
3) 0nly 14 of the 95 bats banded in 09' were seen in 10' and of those 14 only 5 showed wing damage (presumable WNS) in 09'.
4) the colony declined 88% from 08' to 10' and had exactly 3 reproductive females make it from 09' to 10' and this is the largest known summer colony in the State. Do the math. I'll add that this colony is in essentially perfect conditions. A purpose-built bat box on a protected military reservation that has LOTS of nearly ideal habitat.
It is not surprising that bats making it to spring are able to reverse some WNS impacts due to food supplies andd warm weather. It was surprising that at least a few bats WERE able to persist through 2 winters.
One explanation could be partial resistence. Another could be that some bats are able to fully recover from WNS during summer feeding and thus re-enter hibernation in top condition. With dropping bat numbers, the possibility that the remaining bats can exploit abundant food levels seems high.
I'm not scared of the dark, it's the things IN the dark that make me nervous. :)