PYoungbaer wrote:through cavers’ clothing and instruments.
That's it! Cavers' instruments - It's the Terminal Siphons! Decon those guitars and drums! Seal those people in a cave!
Peter, do you know if the NSS has formed a response to this?
Moderator: Moderators
PYoungbaer wrote:through cavers’ clothing and instruments.
That's it! Cavers' instruments - It's the Terminal Siphons! Decon those guitars and drums! Seal those people in a cave!
Sungura wrote:
You know, mother nature has done fine without human interference for many a year. Why not just let nature take it's course?
Hmm yeah but I think it's more just press and public opinion based on poor press so gov't basing things on both of those more than anything...yeah research is a good thing - identifying the fungus, for example, and having a decon protocol - knowing what kills it - is good info. It's the reactions are what I see to be the issue, not the research and such itself. I'm all for understanding more about things, I am not all for going overkill (pun intended). Being in research myself (but a different field - neuro, studying neuropathic pain) I've seen so many times when press releases happen and inevitably enough stuff is gotten wrong...solution ideas out of hand. For example, every few years it seems they want to ban some pain alleviating drug or another, because of abuse of its use. So their idea is to ban everyone to the drug and so of course those whose lives depend on it get screwed and pain being such a unique thing person to person it's not like you can just start substituting drugs - you find what works for you and stick to it. The drug isn't the problem, it's the overreaction to the abuse from people who don't know/don't care that causes problems.BrianC wrote:Sungura wrote:
You know, mother nature has done fine without human interference for many a year. Why not just let nature take it's course?
exactly what most people would think, only problem is there wouldn't be any monies available for research and no job titles for this.
wyandottecaver wrote:It also doesnt clarify the conflicting reports of whether sealing these caves will be done in a manner that will keep be bat friendly or not.
John Lovaas wrote:wyandottecaver wrote:It also doesnt clarify the conflicting reports of whether sealing these caves will be done in a manner that will keep be bat friendly or not.
The quoted passages below are from the WNS-as-invasive agenda item:
http://dnr.wi.gov/org/nrboard/2010/Sept ... 0-3B13.pdf
From the "Effect on small business" section-
"...and providing locations of caves that may be used of(sic) recreational activities (where bats are known to have been excluded)...
and
"Additionally, commercial caves will have the option to exclude bats from their cave(s) with the help of the department, allowing them to remain open for tourism(emph. mine), and resulting in no loss of tourism dollars..."
The plan for cave owners and managers is either exclusion or regulatory action. And exclusion is what one does to keep bats out of a building, not a cave.
Return to White Nose Syndrome (WNS)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users