fireman1904 wrote:Also how much different is it than the PMI pit viper? I have one of those and it looks rather similar to that one. I really like mine and I know it will fit him ok. Any input??
If you have a harness that you know fits him, and he has no problem with it, then why look for something else?
One thing I'd like to point out is that even if the waist belt doesn't fit securely enough around your son's waist, he still might not always fall out of the harness when inverted, because his legs might hold him in via the leg loops. So in addition to hanging upside down to see what happens, your son (and you) should also attempt to pull the harness downward and off of him. If you can't do so, that's good.
Searching Petzl's website for "Superapido" yields no hits. But judging from pictures of the Superapido, it seems to be an older version of the
Petzl Superavanti caving sit harness. This is consistent with Petzl's other name changes (e.g. from Energyca to
Spelegyca). robcountess, can you clarify this?
The Superavanti is nearly identical to the PMI Pit Viper. To the best of my knowledge, the Superavanti doesn't have any characteristics that make it more suitable for young users than the PMI Pit Viper or any other standard caving sit harness. Seven noticeable differences between the PMI Pit Viper and the Petzl Superavanti appear to be:
(1) The large-sized Pit Viper adjusts larger than the large-sized Superavanti.
(2) The PMI Pit Viper is made from softer webbing, which is potentially more subject to damage due to abrasion, but
you're inspecting all your personal protective equipment regularly anyway, right?(3) The Petzl Superavanti has a tab that you insert into the waist strap's buckle after doubling it back, to protect the webbing from abrasion. The PMI Pit Viper doesn't have this feature, but
you're inspecting all your personal protective equipment regularly anyway, right? (The anti-abrasion tab, as well as the stiffer webbing, probably contributes to the harness's longevity. But
you already have a PMI Pit Viper.)
(4) The Petzl Superavanti's buckles are painted black, which either protects them against corrosion, or doesn't protect them against corrosion but makes them difficult to inspect for corrosion. I'm not sure which, or what the rationale is for painting them black, but maybe Hank Moon could address that. The PMI Pit Viper's buckles are not painted.
(5) The Petzl Superavanti's buckles have "DANGER" printed on them so that it is visible whenever they are not doubled back, reminding the wearer to double back the buckles. Like the red band on Petzl's locking carabiners that is visible when the gate is unlocked, this is a nice safety feature--just don't get complacent and assume that when you don't see it, it's doubled back, or when you end up using another harness (or carabiner) for something, you're in trouble.
(6) The Petzl Superavanti masses (a.k.a. "weighs") 31g less than the PMI Pit Viper--a little more than the mass of one ultralight wiregate carabiner.
(7) The Petzl Superavanti costs substantially more than the PMI Pit Viper, on most speleovendor websites.
Another possible difference: The Petzl Superavanti is made from polyester webbing. If the PMI Pit Viper is made from nylon webbing (I don't know about that), then this is probably the most significant technical difference. This is not practically significant, though, unless you are exposing the harnesses to corrosive chemicals. Then the polyester harness will be more resistant to acids than the nylon harness, but less resistant to bases. Your son isn't going to be caving with a lead-acid battery on his belt, is he?
EDIT: While I wouldn't recommend this for your son (he doesn't seem to need a full-body, load-bearing harness, but just a standard sit harness), it's worth mentioning that there is a full-body, load-bearing harness that can be used for frogging: Petzl's
Navaho Bod Croll Fast. The
Top Croll chest harness will also augment
some sit harnesses to create a full-body harness with load-bearing chest harness suitable for frogging.