kmstill wrote:so, if cleaning up the mallion attachment on a custom cowstail is the goal, any reason that one can't sew their own mid loop like this above? any comments regarding safely sewing rope/terminations on a custom cowtail from those that do a lot of sewing/harness making? critical errors? thread type/size?
I tend to agree with Scott's point on this one, although I'm not so sure about needing an engineering or science degree just to do a little sewing - even if it is for life safety.
Looking at the sewns eyes in my Zyper, I see a bar tack pattern approximately 1.75 inches long by 0.5 inches wide. The thread thickness appears to be sightly less than that used on your average commercial climbing harness. There appears to be roughly about 60 individual strands that make up the bar tack. Of course this particular sewn eye is at the end of rope, not in the middle. I've sewn plenty of my own harnesses and slings in the past (on an industrial machine which is no longer with me), but it's unlikely even I would attempt this on my cowstail.
NZ- you have any numbers data handy on the double overhand vs butterfly vs 8 for the mallion knot (9-10 mm range dynamic cord)? is the double overhand significantly smaller?
Why, of course I do
and yes the overhand is significantly smaller. Actually I believe the following test results are predominately with low-stretch rope in the 10-11mm range, but it's a start.
See the current edition of Warild's "Vertical" section on knots
here, page 51. The old (Marbach/Rocourt 1980 and Corbis 1984) testing has the overhand loop retaining a mere 50% rope strength, the figure 8 loop 55%, and the alpine butterly is not listed (and was not a recommended knot in earlier editions of Vertical). These older figures should really be taken with a grain of salt nowadays - not because the testing was flawed, but mostly because rope technology has significantly progressed in the quarter-century since then.
Newer testing wisdom (by Long Lyon and Lyon 2001) now also published in Vertical suggests the overhand loop retains 58-68%, the figure 8 loop 66-77%, and the alpine butterfly 61-72%. Of course all this only matters if you're inclined to worry a lot about percentage points. The overhand loop is much smaller than the others, but once tight it can be very difficult to untie. Alpine Caving Techniques (English edition) shows the overhand used as a mid-cowstail knot on page 41, and also shows an alternate "metal blocking plate" used instead on page 42. I'm not sure what this plate is - perhaps there is a proliferation of DIY versions like it out there around Europe? It has a similar configuration to the Zyper device, but with 3 holes instead of 2.