Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Discuss vertical caving, equipment, & techniques. Also visit the NSS Vertical Section.

Moderator: Tim White

Postby Scott McCrea » May 15, 2006 2:58 pm

Just in case anyone wishes to discuss this further, a thread about the Lori Cori Accident has been started here: http://www.caves.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=584
Scott McCrea
SWAYGO
User avatar
Scott McCrea
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 3198
Joined: Sep 5, 2005 3:07 pm
Location: Asheville, NC USA
NSS #: 40839RL
Primary Grotto Affiliation: Flittermouse Grotto
  

Postby potholer » May 15, 2006 3:04 pm

The Lori Cori incident *was* a very old bobbin with a somewhat different and semingly more primitive catch, with possible failure modes not necessarily applicable in a meaningful way to modern devices.
potholer
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Nov 9, 2005 7:29 am
Location: UK
  

Postby Tubo Longo » May 15, 2006 3:19 pm

I remember to have heard of this accident but haven't read anything about before. Thanks for re-posting it Hunter.

I disagree with a conclusion of the report, in that the use of a brake biner could have help to avoid the fatality, by just allowing to pull the rope over the bobbins in an half-lock style, but without tightening the rope completely. Btw, this is a standard trick used to slow down, sort of additional brake. Using it, the rope would have forced the side plate almost on its correct position. Of course it would have slow down quite a bit the rappel, since it anyway add friction to the system.

I noted a "strange" position of the bobbins in most of the pics in the report: it's in an almost horizontal, or definitely angled, position. Well, I'm a big guy (being at about 230 lb) but still I will have to definitely pull the rope down with quite a bit of force to position my bobbins in such a way. Which is not very consistent, in my experience, with a muddy rope, i.e. a rope which need to be feed in.

Also my impression is that the caver, although experienced, might not have had that much experience with the bobbins, since - 22 years after having traded it - he said something like “This thing seems to be working pretty well so far.â€
Tubo Longo
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Apr 25, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: near Tacoma, WA
Name: Renato
NSS #: ex 29271
Primary Grotto Affiliation: CGEB SAG CAI of Trieste [Italy]
  

Postby Tubo Longo » May 15, 2006 3:21 pm

Scott McCrea wrote:Just in case anyone wishes to discuss this further, a thread about the Lori Cori Accident has been started here: http://www.caves.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=584


Sorry Scott, have seen your post only after I posted mine. But I agree with Potholer, *that* bobbins was the first series with a gate, since before there was no gate at all. We talk of a mid to late 1970's product.
Tubo Longo
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Apr 25, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: near Tacoma, WA
Name: Renato
NSS #: ex 29271
Primary Grotto Affiliation: CGEB SAG CAI of Trieste [Italy]
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby fuzzy-hair-man » May 15, 2006 6:58 pm

Tubo Longo wrote:Well, I don't. Fuzzy-hair-man state it in the opening post...
:
:
I only have bobbins with the metal gate, so I don't know how the new plastic one works with respect of this matter. Besides this, being used to rebelays, the idea to have something which would make almost impossible to open the bobbins is just - sorry, no offense intended - plain crazy to me.


Yes I can easily open the bobbin when intended to thread or unthread the rope.
The Simple and Stop with the metal spring gates also have this problem.
My original post says:

fuzzy-hair-man wrote:I have tried it on rope in a gym (after OKing the modification with other club members) and I didn't notice any difficulty the modification has caused in threading or unthreading the descender. In fact the first time I tried it I forgot I had it on there and only realized later, so concluded that it made almost no difference to the operation of the descender. Kewl

OK, whatever way I rotate the mailion with my hands I have not been able to get the spring gate to open. It does depress the gate slightly but not far enough for the mailion to get past the catch.
User avatar
fuzzy-hair-man
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Apr 6, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Primary Grotto Affiliation: NUCC
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby Tubo Longo » May 15, 2006 8:40 pm

fuzzy-hair-man wrote:
Yes I can easily open the bobbin when intended to thread or unthread the rope.
The Simple and Stop with the metal spring gates also have this problem.
My original post says:

fuzzy-hair-man wrote:I have tried it on rope in a gym (after OKing the modification with other club members) and I didn't notice any difficulty the modification has caused in threading or unthreading the descender. In fact the first time I tried it I forgot I had it on there and only realized later, so concluded that it made almost no difference to the operation of the descender. Kewl

OK, whatever way I rotate the mailion with my hands I have not been able to get the spring gate to open. It does depress the gate slightly but not far enough for the mailion to get past the catch.


OK, I don't get it, sorry. True, you first state that you can thread and unthread the rope without difficulty. Then say that you have not been able to open the spring gate, which is the part I got for good in your post.

Now I'd like to get it: do you refer, in the second part of the quote, to the maillon unintentionally opening the gate because of you moving it around or what? Because I'm definitely confused...
Tubo Longo
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Apr 25, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: near Tacoma, WA
Name: Renato
NSS #: ex 29271
Primary Grotto Affiliation: CGEB SAG CAI of Trieste [Italy]
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby fuzzy-hair-man » May 15, 2006 8:55 pm

Tubo Longo wrote:Now I'd like to get it: do you refer, in the second part of the quote, to the maillon unintentionally opening the gate because of you moving it around or what? Because I'm definitely confused...

Yes,

That's it the conclusion from the Cora Lynn accident investigation was the mailion was able to twist around when the descender became unweighted and push on the spring gate popping the front plate open.

When I say ".....I have not been able to get the spring gate to open.", I mean whatever way I try to manipulate the mailion and the descender I cannot get the mailion to push open the spring gate on the descender.
I can still easily work the spring gate with my hands when I intentionally want to open the descender.

I probably could have worded that clearer :doh:
User avatar
fuzzy-hair-man
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Apr 6, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Primary Grotto Affiliation: NUCC
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby NZcaver » May 15, 2006 9:33 pm

Could you (anyone) post a link to the Cora Lynn accident investigation report?

I'd be interested to check that one out... :?
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby hank moon » May 15, 2006 9:40 pm

NZcaver wrote:Could you (anyone) post a link to the Cora Lynn accident investigation report?

I'd be interested to check that one out... :?


If ya mean Lori Cori...

http://www.bstorage.com/speleo/LoriCoriAccident/

hank
User avatar
hank moon
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 9:52 am
Location: Salt Lake City
  

Re: Petzl Simple and Stop: attachment mailion modification

Postby NZcaver » May 15, 2006 9:44 pm

hank moon wrote:If ya mean Lori Cori...

Wait - is Cora Lynn the same accident as Lori Cori? I'm confused... :shock:
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Postby fuzzy-hair-man » May 15, 2006 9:46 pm

Opps :oops: :doh: I mean Lori Cori.. sorry I think Cora Lynn might be a cave in Tasmania :? either way I'm not sure where I plucked the name from :crazy:

No I just looked it up, Cora Lynn is in South Australia I went in there when in Adelaide. Sorry Again name must of stuck in my brain. and it doesn't even have any vertical :hairpull:
User avatar
fuzzy-hair-man
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Apr 6, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Primary Grotto Affiliation: NUCC
  

Postby NZcaver » May 15, 2006 9:54 pm

fuzzy-hair-man wrote:Opps :oops: :doh: I mean Lori Cori.. sorry I think Cora Lynn might be a cave in Tasmania :? either way I'm not sure where I plucked the name from :crazy:

OK - no problem. I also vaguely recall something about a similar accident/incident more recently, but I think it was in Europe (former USSR possibly?) I wish I could pull up a reference, because I don't think this issue was just a one-time thing... :?
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Postby Tubo Longo » May 16, 2006 4:04 am

NZcaver wrote: I also vaguely recall something about a similar accident/incident more recently, but I think it was in Europe (former USSR possibly?) I wish I could pull up a reference, because I don't think this issue was just a one-time thing... :?


There has been a deadly accident quite recently in France: a very experienced caver, while rigging solo a pit went into free fall and died. He wasn't caving solo, to be correct: he just went ahead of his party to rig the pit (100m? mostly free fall) and so avoid the party to wait while he was rigging, a system quite common in alpine caving.

Apparently the accident was caused by over confidence: he might have not locked the bobbins, not realizing that it got so loose at some point that the head of the bobbins got stuck into the brake biner. When he loaded the bobbins he went, of course, into free fall.

Common opinion is that the accident might have been avoided if: 1. the bobbins would have been locked while rigging 2. the brake biner would have been connected to the bobbins's biner instead than to the maillon.

is this the accident you were recalling?

Renato
Last edited by Tubo Longo on May 17, 2006 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tubo Longo
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Apr 25, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: near Tacoma, WA
Name: Renato
NSS #: ex 29271
Primary Grotto Affiliation: CGEB SAG CAI of Trieste [Italy]
  

Postby NZcaver » May 16, 2006 5:55 am

Tubo Longo wrote:is this the accident you were recalling?

I'm not sure - it may have been that incident. When did it happen, and is there a detailed accident report available on-line?

Common opinion is that the accident might have been avoided if: 1. the bobbins would have been locked while rigging 2. the brake biner would have been connected to the bobbins's biner instead than to the maillon.

I'm confused by your second point. My understanding is that if you use a separate braking carabiner you should always clip it directly into your maillon - and never into your descender attachment carabiner. Something like this:

Image

As a reference, check out pages 70-72 in "Vertical" (the 3rd, 4th and 5th pages down on this link) - http://www.caves.com/6DESCENT.pdf

Have you been taught different? :question:
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Postby Baazalung » May 16, 2006 12:30 pm

A Petzl Freino would have meant a great deal to him :goodjob:
It's better down here than out there...
User avatar
Baazalung
Frequent Poster
 
Posts: 56
Joined: May 12, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Romania
  

PreviousNext

Return to On Rope!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users