Scott McCrea wrote:We used one of my ropes to pull a SUV out of the snow in WV this weekend.
Conventional wisdom says to retire the rope, which I will. ... Was strength seriously compromised?
You've left out information that would help make the decision
--and "conventional wisdom" looks damn shallow if it doesn't
seek such help! I'll repeat what I wrote/asked (unanswered)
in the thread referred to above.
How did you use the rope, exactly? I.e., how was it configured,
was it knotted, and so on. How does it look, afterwards, and how
does it feel? Is it the same length (and not now longer & thinner)?
I imagine that the pulling was done with care, slow-delivery,
in concern for the rope and vehicles. Could say four big guys
have pushed that vehicle out? That SUV was helping itself move,
wasn't it?
(My guess is that your rope is fine. And this is a caving not rockclimbing
forum, so we're not concerned with great loss of dynamic capability.)
The
How-much-is-your-life-worth-? doubters could put that question
to anything: at some point, one needs to be able to evaluate the
circumstance beyond conjecture. The breaking strength of that
rope might be nearly adequate to hoist the vehicle, and
merely pulling it --"mere", at least, in some cases-- will take far
less load. Nylon fibres can endure about 70% of their maximum
load w/o sustained damage, I've been told [long ago, by a tech
chief at Plymouth Cordage (Goldline, remember?)]. And if you doubled
the rope (perhaps making a big loop/sling), you are halving the
force per strand. If the rope looks fine and knots weren't welded,
you're probably fine.
(As for petroleum products, well, petrol per se isn't an issue,
though for some time it was a rumored issue --rumors out race
research/facts, often-- ; additives in petrol might be.)
*kN*