Moderator: Tim White
NZcaver wrote:Sustaining 7.4 feet per second for 6 minutes, and being able to hold it with bare hands afterwards?
Scott McCrea wrote:NZcaver wrote:Sustaining 7.4 feet per second for 6 minutes, and being able to hold it with bare hands afterwards?
But, if you slow for last 50' or so and let the rope absorb a bunch of heat, the rack will cool a lot.
NZcaver wrote:Scott McCrea wrote:NZcaver wrote:Sustaining 7.4 feet per second for 6 minutes, and being able to hold it with bare hands afterwards?
But, if you slow for last 50' or so and let the rope absorb a bunch of heat, the rack will cool a lot.
Saw you post that before. Interesting. Sounds like you may have tested this theory with a thermometer?
Scott McCrea wrote:I also helped with an experiment using a thermal imaging camera at the '05 convention. It showed that the rope above the descender got nearly as hot as the device, but dissipated the heat quickly. Using those two experiences, I conclude that rope absorbs a good bit of heat away from the descender.
NZcaver wrote:I also remember reading somewhere that a portion of the heat created rappelling is through the compression/expansion bending action of the rope itself, which may be another reason the rope was so hot just above the moving descender. I can't find the reference, but it does introduce an interesting alternative to heat being solely a product of surface friction between rope and rack.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users