bsignorelli wrote:I dunno anyone who uses a compass (surveying not included) while in a cave.
Ummm... anytime I use a map in a cave? Maybe I am a Luddite, but whenever I use a map, I orient it- and that requires a compass.
And the battered little Silva in my cave pack can be useful on the surface as well.
As to the grid north/magnetic north debate, I don't think it hurts to include both, as long as include the metadata for the Nm arrow.
In my limited experience, the printed map is often the only surviving artifact of past survey efforts. While we'd like to think that grotto libraries and state surveys are perfect systems for retaining data, they are not. Because of the (generally) wider distribution of cave maps, they have a better chance of making it into the hands of users in the future than the source data.
Now the value of including the Nm arrow is also dependent on where you are in the US; most everything I draft is within a 1 to 1.5 degree window, which is within the accuracy tolerance of the individual survey shots. So if my survey is no more accurate than the range of grid north/Nm, then why bother, I guess?
I reckon that whatever North arrow(or arrows) you use, it should be clear to the user just which North it is. 30 or 40 years down the road, it just might be of value to a researcher- and if the magnetic north pole continues to move faster each year, the datum information may be even more important.