I think we do differ on a key point. I believe landowners have the say so on access because they do in fact own the physical property. The map? Survey notes? trip descriptions? Those are the products of others cash, sweat and labor. We may consider landowner wishes in the interest of good relations and keeping access, but they have no inherent rights of control for the labor and products of others unless that was specified as part of the access priviledge.
Dean:
I think people still equate maps and locations as equal. They are not. I agree with others that maps increase safety, not decrease it. Even if we ignore the fact that they still need location data and assume maps will drive increased visitation, the question is this: Is that bad? Yes more people will eventually equal more accidents. It will also equal a larger user base, more people who LIKE caves, andd more people interested in protecting access, which will give cavers more voice...especially on public property. By making access to maps, which are a key safety tool, easier, we will help safety not hurt it. Locations dont help anything except visitation.
*edit* Everyone knows it's those reckless cavers who don't use string that are the safety risk
