Moderator: Moderators
anthonytsi wrote:I decided against the Go Pro due to someone that I know saying the same thing about the light situation. He also said that it has a sort of fisheye lens that puts the light right in the middle and the surrounding video is dark.
NZcaver wrote:You just need a wider light.
The Go Pro is nice, but would be much more practical (and more appropriate value for money) if it had a small screen built-in so you can actually review the footage and/or shoot handheld and see what you're getting.
After experimenting with my ATC-2K for a while, I pretty much gave up on helmet cams for caving or anything else. Unless a specific need arises, I'll either use the video mode in my little Canon point-and-shoot (which is pretty good in low light), or just stick with stills.
NZcaver wrote:You just need a wider light.
The Go Pro is nice, but would be much more practical (and more appropriate value for money) if it had a small screen built-in so you can actually review the footage and/or shoot handheld and see what you're getting.
After experimenting with my ATC-2K for a while, I pretty much gave up on helmet cams for caving or anything else. Unless a specific need arises, I'll either use the video mode in my little Canon point-and-shoot (which is pretty good in low light), or just stick with stills.
Mugger wrote:NZcaver wrote:You just need a wider light.
The Go Pro is nice, but would be much more practical (and more appropriate value for money) if it had a small screen built-in so you can actually review the footage and/or shoot handheld and see what you're getting.
After experimenting with my ATC-2K for a while, I pretty much gave up on helmet cams for caving or anything else. Unless a specific need arises, I'll either use the video mode in my little Canon point-and-shoot (which is pretty good in low light), or just stick with stills.
The newer Go Pros have optional "backpacks" that can be added, one being a small LCD screen (retail here locally is about $55-60). I was able to play around with one the other day and thought it was pretty cool. The LCD pack comes with a replacement door so the camera remains waterproof (to about 100') with the screen attached.
Some of the older models were really bad with the fish eye view, but the newest one seems to be better.
anthonytsi wrote:Mugger wrote:NZcaver wrote:You just need a wider light.
The Go Pro is nice, but would be much more practical (and more appropriate value for money) if it had a small screen built-in so you can actually review the footage and/or shoot handheld and see what you're getting.
After experimenting with my ATC-2K for a while, I pretty much gave up on helmet cams for caving or anything else. Unless a specific need arises, I'll either use the video mode in my little Canon point-and-shoot (which is pretty good in low light), or just stick with stills.
The newer Go Pros have optional "backpacks" that can be added, one being a small LCD screen (retail here locally is about $55-60). I was able to play around with one the other day and thought it was pretty cool. The LCD pack comes with a replacement door so the camera remains waterproof (to about 100') with the screen attached.
Some of the older models were really bad with the fish eye view, but the newest one seems to be better.
Can you expand on the "newest one seems to be better"?. Do you own the newest one?
Mugger wrote:The newer Go Pros have optional "backpacks" that can be added, one being a small LCD screen (retail here locally is about $55-60). I was able to play around with one the other day and thought it was pretty cool.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users