spent batteries

Discuss caving lights, packs, helmets, clothing, etc.
For rope and vertical equipment, go to the On Rope! forum.
Cave electronics enthusiasts can also visit the Communications and Electronics Section forum.

Moderator: Moderators

spent batteries

Postby hydrology_joe » Feb 22, 2006 2:12 pm

I am just trying to find out what everyone does with their spent batteries. I was recycling mine at the county household hazardous waste site until I found out that they just containerize them in 55gal drums and ship them to the landfill. Has anyone found a recycling company that actually recycles the batteries?

My biggest concern is the leaching of heavy metals out of the batteries into the environment. I know that there are only trace quantites of the heavy metals in a battery, but considering the anoxic & acidic environment of landfill leachate, the metals are mobilized quite easily. The EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels for the metals are in the parts-per-billion range (Arsenic 10ppb, Cadmium 5ppb, Lead 15ppb, Mercury 5ppb, Selenium 50ppb)
What part of "Shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
User avatar
hydrology_joe
Frequent Poster
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Sep 16, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: Topeka, KS
  

Postby Scott McCrea » Feb 22, 2006 2:28 pm

I looked into this a while back. My hope was to take a bucket to grotto meetings and have members deposit spent batteries in it. Then send the bucket to a recycler. I never found a recycler. I only found places that would 'properly' dispose of them. I ended up switching everything to NiMH rechargables.

Here's the links I found way back when...
http://www.rawmaterials.com/rmcproducts.htm
http://www.batteryrecycling.com/index.html
http://www.idrc.ca/industry/brazil_e6.html
Scott McCrea
SWAYGO
User avatar
Scott McCrea
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 3198
Joined: Sep 5, 2005 3:07 pm
Location: Asheville, NC USA
NSS #: 40839RL
Primary Grotto Affiliation: Flittermouse Grotto
  

Postby David_Campen » Feb 22, 2006 2:52 pm

The EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels for the metals are in the parts-per-billion range (Arsenic 10ppb, Cadmium 5ppb, Lead 15ppb, Mercury 5ppb, Selenium 50ppb)

I wonder if that is any higher than levels for other materials sent to the dump?

I suspect that any attempt at recycling alkaline batteries would produce more pollution than it would prevent.
David_Campen
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Sep 9, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: SoCal
  

Postby wendy » Feb 22, 2006 3:05 pm

Scott that's a great idea to use rechargable batteries. You can get a charger pretty cheap at walmart too. That's what I use for my camera.
User avatar
wendy
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sep 5, 2005 10:51 am
Location: florida
Name: Wendy
NSS #: 53923
Primary Grotto Affiliation: Flint River Grotto
  

Postby hydrology_joe » Feb 22, 2006 10:30 pm

David_Campen wrote:I wonder if that is any higher than levels for other materials sent to the dump?


David, Those are the EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels for drinking water. You can check specific MCLs at the EPA Website

Currently I work in soil & groundwater remediation at closed landfills & contaminated drycleaner sites (among other duties and hence the screen name). So that is what spawned the interest. I have been blindly "recycling" my spent batteries (both alkaline and lithium) at the county HHW facility until I found out what they do with them. My own searching for battery recycling yielded that only lead-acid batteries can be recycled efficiently. I was just wondering what everyone else was doing with their spent batteries.

I plan on switching to NiMH for my electric lights but rely mainly on my :carbide: for most of my caving.
What part of "Shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
User avatar
hydrology_joe
Frequent Poster
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Sep 16, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: Topeka, KS
  

Postby Dan Sullivan » Feb 22, 2006 11:46 pm

Our grotto uses pailmail, and has for several years now. We take it out of the grotto funds.

http://www.batteryrecycling.com/pailmail.html

We have the smaller bucket and send it in about four times a year. They supposedly use it in the manufacture on rebar.

Alkaline / Zinc Carbon Batteries
Zero Added Mercury (<.025% by weight mercury):


The batteries are shredded and given a slight acid bath to neutralize the electrolyte. This material is run through a rotary kiln to dry. At this point, carbon steel turnings are blended in at a ratio of 20-40 parts to 1 part of battery material. This blended material is pressed into bricks which are magnetic. This material is transported to a steel mill for processing. In the furnace of the steel mill, the zinc from the battery is fumed off into a vacuum baghouse for recovery and resale as zinc-oxide. The manganese dioxide becomes an alloy in the production of re-bar steel.



http://www.batteryrecycling.com/alkalinezinc.html
Dan Sullivan
 
  

Postby hank moon » Mar 5, 2006 5:06 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:Our grotto uses pailmail, and has for several years now. We take it out of the grotto funds.

http://www.batteryrecycling.com/pailmail.html


Petzl America uses this same company. We get tons of alkaline batteries back lamps returned for warranty inspection, repair, etc. Good service. I would be surprised if most cavers aren't using rechargeables. Hmmm...poll fodder?

hank
User avatar
hank moon
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 9:52 am
Location: Salt Lake City
  

Postby bsignorelli » Mar 7, 2006 2:11 am

That PailMail system is interesting. I've got a bucket going already here at the house just waiting for a solution like this.

I think I'll bring this up at the next grotto meeting and even if someone balks at the $8 I think I'll spring for that out of my own pocket.
Bryan Signorelli
Little Rock Grotto
54238
bsignorelli
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 4, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Arkanistan
  

Postby Mike Rz » Mar 7, 2006 7:39 am

Radio Shack sells Ni-MH AA batteries that can be recharged in 15 minutes. Its the same battery technology used in the hybrid vehicles so there is unlimited recharges and no battery memory. The batteries cost ~4/$14 and the charger is ~$28 w/ 2 batteries. Scientific tests performed in my desk drawer indicate 4 hr life in a Mini Mag AA and 6hr in a 3AA Petzl Zoom. I forgot I was performing an LED test. Combined with my car's plug-in 12V/115VAC inverter its a great technology.
Mike
Mike Rz
Infrequent Poster
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mar 6, 2006 4:31 pm
  

Postby NZcaver » Mar 7, 2006 8:55 am

Mike Rz wrote:Radio Shack sells Ni-MH AA batteries that can be recharged in 15 minutes. Its the same battery technology used in the hybrid vehicles so there is unlimited recharges and no battery memory. The batteries cost ~4/$14 and the charger is ~$28 w/ 2 batteries. Scientific tests performed in my desk drawer indicate 4 hr life in a Mini Mag AA and 6hr in a 3AA Petzl Zoom. I forgot I was performing an LED test. Combined with my car's plug-in 12V/115VAC inverter its a great technology.

I also prefer using rechargeables to disposables, and have been for years. With current rechargeable technologies, I don't understand why so many people (and cavers) still use alkalines/lithiums. I can see why they get installed in emergency items are seldom used, but not in lights, cameras, and other gadgets.
Anyone ever heard of Reduce, Reuse, Recycle? :question:

If you check around, you should find much better deals for NiMHs and chargers than what Radio Shack offers. Wal-Mart, for example, sells a 4x 2300 mAH pack of AAs for under $10 - and I'm sure you'll find even better deals on line. For what it's worth, I have a $20 Radio Shack 12-hour charger that has done me well for about 5 years.

I do think your "unlimited recharges" comment is a bit optimistic. All batteries have a finite life and/or maximum number of recharges, even NiMHs. And in my experience, the fast chargers (< 1-hour) tend to kill NiMHs much quicker than the regular overnight chargers. Other people's experiences may vary, but I think I'll stick with slow chargers for now.


As for that PailMail system - great idea! I guess $8 a pail is OK, but they must kill you on the shipping. Though I do wonder why the US consumer should have to pay to recycle something. I would think that's just one more reason for the Average Joe NOT to bother recycling. :rant:
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Postby Lava » Mar 7, 2006 11:47 am

NZcaver wrote:I also prefer using rechargeables to disposables, and have been for years. With current rechargeable technologies, I don't understand why so many people (and cavers) still use alkalines/lithiums.


I use alkaline AAs in my backup light on my helmet. The problem is my main light, which runs on rechargeable lithium-ion packs, is so reliable I never turn my backup light on. In the past I have found that rechargeable AA cells lose their charge quickly sitting in a backup light unused, compared to alkaline AAs. But the last time I tried this was over 10 years ago, so maybe I should give it another shot now that the technology has likely improved. How long do your unused rechargeable AAs keep their charge?
User avatar
Lava
NSS Hall Of Fame Poster
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Sep 5, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: Molten core of Earth
Name: Bruce White
NSS #: 39223
Primary Grotto Affiliation: San Francisco Bay Chapter
  

Postby David_Campen » Mar 7, 2006 1:41 pm

I use alkaline and Lithium AA cells still so I am not real up to date on NiMH AA battery technology but AFAIK

the disadvantages of NiMH are:

1) Self discharge rates as high 15%/month

2) Damaged by being discharged to too low a voltage

3) Do not perform as well when cold as Lithium AA cells; but probably better than alkaline.

4) Are heavier than Lithium AA cells; but about the same as alkaline.

5) Less energy content than Lithium AA; but better than alkaline especially for moderate to high discharge rates.

Manufacturers are working to produce NiMH batteries with much lower self discharge rates but it comes at some reduction in energy content.

If cost is no object then Lithium AAs are superior but if you don't mind charging the cells a few days before use and carrying some extra weight then NiMH could save a lot of money over Lithium and provide better performance than alkaline.

The one problem with NiMH that I would want to know more about is that I have heard that they are damaged by too deep of a discharge.
David_Campen
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Sep 9, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: SoCal
  

Postby ethan » Mar 7, 2006 2:25 pm

hank_moon wrote:Petzl America uses this same company. We get tons of alkaline batteries back lamps returned for warranty inspection, repair, etc. Good service. I would be surprised if most cavers aren't using rechargeables. Hmmm...poll fodder?


You should do a quick test on all the returned cells and sort out the good ones. I've been caving on "reused" alkaline cells for years now. It's amazing how many people will throw away cells after only a bit of use. As long as I'm not caving in a place where battery changes are inconvenient or impossible, I'll always start a day on a set of used batteries.

Ethan
ethan
Occasional Poster
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sep 6, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Name: Ethan Brodsky
NSS #: 53507
Primary Grotto Affiliation: WSS
  

Postby JackW » Mar 7, 2006 4:42 pm

***Temporary Thread Hi-jack Alert***

hydrology_joe wrote:Currently I work in soil & groundwater remediation at closed landfills & contaminated drycleaner sites (among other duties and hence the screen name).


Ah, I do hazardous waste management and permit compliance for a "mid-sized" manufacturing/repairer and lessor of rail cars. I'm a CHMM. You guys hiring? Curious to find out what company you work for. Care to PM me?

[/hi-jack]

Dan Sullivan wrote:Our grotto uses pailmail, and has for several years now. We take it out of the grotto funds.

http://www.batteryrecycling.com/pailmail.html


As to the pail-mail on batteries, that does sound like an interesting idea.
Last edited by JackW on Mar 17, 2006 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JackW
Prolific Poster
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sep 6, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Denver
Name: Jack Wood
NSS #: 42272
Primary Grotto Affiliation: FRG
  

Postby NZcaver » Mar 7, 2006 7:26 pm

Lava wrote:I use alkaline AAs in my backup light on my helmet. The problem is my main light, which runs on rechargeable lithium-ion packs, is so reliable I never turn my backup light on. In the past I have found that rechargeable AA cells lose their charge quickly sitting in a backup light unused, compared to alkaline AAs. But the last time I tried this was over 10 years ago, so maybe I should give it another shot now that the technology has likely improved. How long do your unused rechargeable AAs keep their charge?

I can understand using non-rechargeables in backup lights - which might fall under the category of seldom-used-emergency-devices. I use NiMHs in both my main and backups, and never have a problem (all the lighting on my electric setup is LED).

If you last tried rechargeables 10 years ago, perhaps you should give them another chance? Were AA etc NiMHs even invented 10 years ago? If so, they certainly didn't have the capacity they do today. And if not, you are probably thinking of NiCads - which are truly useless.

All I know is that I can overnight recharge my 4xAA 2300 mAH Energizer NiMHs after a trip, put them back in the headlamp (a Petzl Duo 8 LED), and use it a month later on a 12 hour plus trip with no problems. Sometimes I even leave them in for day two! (By which time they do inevitably need changing.) I also carry spare NiMHs, and 4xLithium AAs "just in case" (I've never used those).

Occasionally I swap my headlamp NiMHs into my camera, which chews batteries a little faster on some trips. Much more important to have a working digital camera than a good light - right? :wink:

I'm not sure of the facts and figures on NiMH discharge rates, be I see David quoted up to 15% per month. I don't think mine discharge that quick, but if they do - it doesn't seem to cause me any problems. And you can always recharge them the night before caving, anyway. With my regulated LEDs I don't believe over-discharging is even a factor. As I mentioned previously, in my experience fast-charging (frying) NiMHs kills them quicker than anything else.

Cold conditions haven't seemed to be a problem either (but admittedly I don't often use them below freezing). The weight of NiMHs (comparable to Alkalines) doesn't concern me, and the voltage difference I have learned to live with - the regulated LED seems to handle things fine. I should note that I now use a 1 watt side-emitting LED in the high beam of the Duo, because the old halogen bulb was all-but-useless after a short period of use on NiMHs. (I used to barely use the high beam, but now it's part of an efficient system again.)
I like Ethan's plan for re-using alkalines - I used to do the same thing before switching to NiMHs. :banana:
User avatar
NZcaver
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6367
Joined: Sep 7, 2005 2:05 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Name: Jansen
NSS #: 50665RL
  

Next

Return to Equipment Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron