Moderator: Moderators
Bobatnathrop wrote:
Oo and I am saying it doesnt exist, Just saying that I havent seen it. Specially when it was like -5degs here for like 2 weeks.
-Jeremy
He also responded directly to the producers in a letter.In the part of the "Swindle" film where I am describing the fact that the ocean tends to expel carbon dioxide where it is warm, and to absorb it where it is cold, my intent was to explain that warming the ocean could be dangerous---because it is such a gigantic reservoir of carbon. By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human influence must not be very important --- diametrically opposite to the point I was making --- which is that global warming is both real and threatening in many different ways, some unexpected.
. . .
Channel 4 now says they were making a film in a series of "polemics". There is nothing in the communication we had (much of it on the telephone or with the film crew on the day they were in Boston) that suggested they were making a film that was one-sided, anti-educational, and misleading. I took them at face value---clearly a great error. I knew I had no control over the actual content, but it never occurred to me that I was dealing with people who already had a reputation for distortion and exaggeration.
Bobatnathrop wrote:Sure man-made source contribute a small percentage. But natural sources do FAR more damage than humans ever could. -Jeremy
The average HS science book seems to be wrong.Bobatnathrop wrote:The average HS Science book says that one volcanic eruption puts out more polutants than all mad-made sources....Ever....
Just my two cents.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users