David Grimes wrote:I agree with LukeM, I think this forum is pretty mild also.
As do I. I especially appreciate the relative scarcity of obscenity. Many forums seem to be used mainly by those whose vocabulary contains no non-vulgar adjectives.
Moderator: Moderators
David Grimes wrote:I agree with LukeM, I think this forum is pretty mild also.
Marduke wrote:How about the ability to at least block people then? The "friend/foe" thing doesn't really help. Foe's still see what you post, and are fully capable of being just as much of a jerk as always.
NZcaver wrote:Marduke wrote:How about the ability to at least block people then? The "friend/foe" thing doesn't really help. Foe's still see what you post, and are fully capable of being just as much of a jerk as always.
This forum used to have an ignore member option, but it seems to have disappeared - presumably during one of the many software updates.
Mudduck wrote:What about simply creating a separate archive for info say older than a year and lock it and lable it as "for reference only".
NZcaver wrote:Mudduck wrote:What about simply creating a separate archive for info say older than a year and lock it and lable it as "for reference only".
A reasonable suggestion, but I'm reluctant to support the locking of all 'information' (discussion topics) just because they are over a year old. I suspect some people view this forum primarily as a current events social networking/blog site, but other members and lurkers may consider it more a timeless interactive caving resource. Or a contentious hotbed of dissenting arguments that are forever beating the same dead horses, depending on your perspective.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users